Diagnosis of pneumonia between 11–15 years of age was associated with MS after age 20 years. The magnitude of the association remained similar, although somewhat reduced and not statistically significant, after imposing stricter inclusion criteria and multiple sensitivity analyses including accounting for possible MS onset.
From exposure to risk factors, to initiation of MS disease activity, it may take 10–20 years before there is sufficient clinical information to make an MS diagnosis.26 Adolescence likely represents a critical period of susceptibility before MS’s onset or prodromal phase when some environmental exposures may initiate autoimmune processes in the CNS resulting in MS development.12 27 We hypothesise that pneumonia infections in adolescence could represent such an exposure.
Association of pneumonia with subsequent MS
Only pneumonia between ages 11–15 years was statistically significantly associated with subsequent MS. This is consistent with other studies showing some MS risks in adolescence are not associated with MS if they occur in earlier childhood, such as Epstein-Barr virus infections/IM,11 28 or CNS trauma.12 29 Additionally, IM is a known risk factor for MS and the largest magnitude association between IM and MS seen in this study was for IM infection at 11–15 years. This possibly indicates heightened MS susceptibility during the peripubertal period, which may help to explain the association with pneumonia at this age with subsequent MS. The sensitivity analysis with MS diagnosis after age 30 years found similar results (although of smaller magnitude and not statistically significant) for peripubertal pneumonia, while pneumonia at age 21–30 years was not associated with MS. We would expect an association of pneumonia during 21–30 years of age with MS after age 30 years due to possible influences of prodromal MS disease, which we did not observe, further indicating that the peripubertal period could be a critical period of susceptibility for MS development later in life. When including MS diagnosis and onset after age 20 years, the magnitude of association with MS between 11–15 years of age remained very similar, although not statistically significant, probably due to the notable decrease in statistical power (only a limited subset of patients with MS had information on age of onset). UTI diagnoses were even rarer than pneumonia during childhood and adolescence, but there was no evidence of an association with MS for this control diagnosis, a known consequence of MS. This further indicates that the association of pneumonia with MS is possibly not due to reverse causation during a period of prodromal MS disease activity.
Possible role of pneumonia in development of MS
The role of pneumonia in the development of MS is speculative, but pneumonia causes inflammation in the lung, and is associated with an influx of immune cells including T and B cells. We hypothesise that immune cells activated in response to lower airway pathogens are also involved in immune mechanisms related to MS. For example, airway infections by Streptococcus pneumoniae30 31 and Haemophilus influenzae32 induce a robust local and systemic T-helper (Th)17 response, including memory Th17 cells. Through molecular mimicry or other mechanisms, Th17 could be reactivated and infiltrate the CNS.33 Similarly, pneumonia is also associated with secretion of CXCL12 (stromal-derived factor 1),34 35 and expression of the CXCL12 receptor CXCR4 which has recently been described as a signature feature of T cells involved in MS pathology.36 This indicates potential immunological mechanisms, and activation of cellular subsets, through which pneumonia could increase the risk of MS. Similar mechanisms could also be involved in the aggravation of symptoms, relapses and increase of disability that are seen in patients with MS with airway infections.37 The lung and BALT have been shown to be involved in the initiation of autoimmune neuro-inflammation,5 however the role of BALT in humans is unclear as there is evidence indicating that BALT represents a constitutive structure in children, but in adults it is usually only present during pneumonia and in smokers.38–40
Strengths and limitations
This study determined age-specific exposures relevant to MS risk at ages that broadly represent stages of neurological development, assessing potentially critical periods before the preclinical phase of MS. The use of the PR captured serious episodes of hospital-diagnosed pneumonia that may be more aggressive, as less severe pneumonia is treated at the primary care level and is not recorded in the PR. We chose pneumonia as this respiratory infection is more serious than, for example, influenza or bronchitis, with more possible sequelae including long-term inflammatory and systemic immunological consequences. However, it is possible that other respiratory tract infections also influence MS risk.
This study controlled for IM diagnoses, another infection in adolescence associated with increased MS risk later in life, but adjusting for IM had little impact on the magnitude of the association between pneumonia and subsequent MS. This study considered MS diagnoses after age 20 years, and employed two strict inclusion criteria of MS cases in order to reduce misclassification and identify possible risk periods. It also included a sensitivity analyses using MS onset in conjunction with diagnosis and all analyses demonstrated a similar, consistent pattern of results across age groups. However, despite a reduction in numbers of subjects and episodes of pneumonia due to the stricter inclusion definitions, the magnitude of the association remained consistent, although somewhat reduced.
Potential limitations include possible misclassification of MS cases. Under case definition 1, use of both the PR and MSR captured more MS cases. Although the MSR has a high coverage, some patients are only captured by the PR. The PR has high accuracy of MS diagnoses, even when using one diagnosis of MS, but it is possible to receive an ICD code for suspected rather than confirmed MS, which may increase misclassification. This is why we also used case definition 2 as it has been shown that using a definition of two or more MS diagnoses in the PR reduces misclassification.41 Misclassification is mainly an issue from 2001 onwards due to the addition of the outpatient register to the PR. In a post hoc analysis of the MS cases with a first diagnosis from 2001 onwards under case definition 1 (n=4986), 90.77% were still included under case definition 2 (n=4526), demonstrating a high level of accuracy in this time period. Overall, 91.54% of all cases included under case definition 1 were also included under case definition 2, indicating a low risk of substantial misclassification bias. Additionally, the measure of MS onset may not always capture true onset of the disease process, as it is based on a history which may not identify symptoms truly associated with MS or the first symptom, but this is unlikely to overestimate risk. This measure was also only available for a subset of patients, notably reducing statistical power.
Furthermore, we cannot rule out that the observed association was potentially due to chance or unobserved confounding as we did not have information on lifestyle factors as our study was limited to register-based data. Despite factors such as active/passive smoking and obesity being unavailable, which could be associated with both pneumonia and MS, the association with pneumonia was largely limited to one age category, at an age before most people tend to start smoking heavily. Therefore, active/passive smoking is unlikely to be a major confounding factor as the consequences of confounding of this nature would have been observed in most age groups (with associations of pneumonia with MS in most age groups), and especially in the age group 20–30 years as we would expect to see a possible cumulative effect of smoking over time. Nevertheless, we should consider these explanations given the primary analysis and sensitivity analysis 1 found an association of pneumonia between 11–15 years of age with MS, but observed non-statistically significant results in subsequent sensitivity analyses, although they were of a similar magnitude. This could also be due to reduced sample sizes after imposing stricter inclusion criteria and sensitivity analyses, losing nearly 50% of MS cases in sensitivity analysis 3.
Another potential limitation included not being able to consider vaccinations against S. pneumoniae. Pneumococcal vaccination became part of the vaccination scheme in 2009, and little if any data are available before 2008 on the level of vaccination coverage in Sweden.42 However, this is unlikely to affect the results as too few of the individuals in this study would have been born sufficiently recently to have been vaccinated as children. Additionally, only up to a third of pneumonia diagnoses in unvaccinated children are caused by S. pneumoniae.43 Furthermore, we could not assess if the cause of pneumonia (bacterial or viral) differentially influenced MS risk. Reliable differentiation of pneumonia diagnoses from the PR is difficult as not all specific infecting organisms are characterised, ICD codes vary over time and there is clinician and regional variation in coding.
Another potential limitation is the use of education as a proxy for socioeconomic circumstances: a more direct measure of material conditions of the household would be desirable to more accurately assess risk of infections.