Discussion
OTT has a major impact on the effectiveness of treatment with IVT only, MT only and IVT+MT in patients with AIS. Analysis of patient outcomes from OTT reductions commonly features estimations of mRS-90d scores based on relative effect measurements. The development of predictive models for estimating patient outcomes for different types of acute stroke treatment, regardless of the comparable effectiveness of alternative treatments, could help guide further adaptation of acute stroke care management for specific types of treatment and improve functional outcomes in patients with AIS.
To fit the predictive models to each of the four types of acute stroke treatment in this study, it was necessary to acquire appropriate types and quantities of patient observations for analysis. This was achieved by matching patient registry data from the National Board of Health and Welfare and Riksstroke with data records from two emergency call operators in Sweden. The aim was to set out prediction models with the simplest possible expression with regression analysis, and without incursion of prediction accuracy loss in comparison to neural network models and simple decision trees designed with machine learning. This study demonstrated linear associations between the mRS-90d score and OTT to IVT only, MT only and IVT+MT. The predictive models estimated the impact of OTT reductions on mRS-90d scores in patients with AIS using absolute effects measures. The results are in analogy with the incorporated evidence in the current guidelines for acute stroke care management and further strengthen the established associations of OTT with IVT and MT from previous studies.22–25
The predictive GLMs reinforced the baseline NIHSS score as the most important predictor variable of mRS-90d scores in patients with AIS in all four patient groups.26 Thus, despite the higher mean age, the comparatively low median hospital admission NIHSS scores of the CVT and IVT only patient groups accounted for the lower mean mRS-90d scores of these two patient groups compared with the MT only and IVT+MT patient groups.
For patients treated with IVT+MT, the expected downward shift on the mRS-90d following OTT reductions was substantially larger than that for patients treated with MT only, a finding that requires corroboration in future studies. The proportion of patients with reported incidence of sICH in the MT only patient group was surprisingly low, while being just slightly low in the IVT+MT patient group, in comparison to reported sICH rates in patients treated with MT only or IVT+MT in recent studies.27 This study observed a lower sICH rate in the MT only patient group than in IVT+MT patient group, in accordance with Bigdata Observatory platform for Stroke of China-based registry study findings.28
In comparison with pooled patient-level data from five trials in the Highly Effective Reperfusion Using Multiple Endovascular Devices (HERMES) collaboration, the mRS-90d score distribution of MT-treated patients in this study differed notably.29 Among the MT-treated patients in this study (ie, MT only and IVT+MT patients), the reported proportion of patients with functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days post-stroke was 21% compared with 46% in HERMES. The higher median age of MT-treated patients in this study (72 vs 68 years), with a more than doubled median OTT to IVT (201 vs 100 min), may be ascribed to partial explanations for the disparity in mRS-90d score distributions. Certainly, further explanation may be attributable to the sizeable difference between the reported median OTT to MT of 373 min in this study and the reported median time from stroke onset to reperfusion of 285 min for MT patients in HERMES. Furthermore, this study included observations of patients treated with MT that predated the roll-out of second-generation MT devices in clinical practice. Thus, the use of suboptimal MT devices in combination with the limited interventional experience at comprehensive stroke centres during the early years of the study period may also account for some of the differences in the mRS-90d score distribution of MT patients in this study compared with HERMES.
The potential influence of unidentified confounding factors adhering to observational studies limits the certainty of the evidence. The proportion of missing data across patient groups, as shown in table 2, entails a risk of bias in the data, which may impede the internal validity of the results. Thus, despite displaying conformity with previous literature on the connections between OTT and functional outcomes in patients with AIS, the presence of unknown context-specific confounders that decimate the internal validity of predictive GLMs cannot be ruled out. Fitting the GLMs with as few independent and commonly accessible variables as possible simplifies the modelling framework’s transferability beyond the scope of this study, insofar as the specific parameter estimates of the independent variables in the presented GLMs reflect the unique age, NIHSS score and OTT distributions of the Swedish stroke population.
The algorithm employed in this study for calculating mRS-90d scores based on patients who had a stroke’s self-reported levels of ADL concatenates the mRS-scores 0, 1 and 2 into mRS-score 0–2. Thus, the fitted GLMs predicted patients who had a stroke’s mRS-90d scores on a 5-level scale. How the predictive GLMs would perform on the 7-levelled scale and whether such GLM fittings would alter the established linearised associations between mRS-90d scores and OTT for IVT and MT in this study, remains unanswered.
Optimisation problems can be stated to help find potential solutions for both strategic and tactical decision problems in systems of care for acute stroke, such as location-allocation problems concerned with the optimal placement of comprehensive stroke centres and the allocation of EMS vehicles. The demonstrated feasibility of fitting GLMs that predict the mRS-90d scores in patients with AIS by estimating the impact of patient age, hospital admission NIHSS and OTTs on IVT and MT in absolute effect measures enables system optimisation of acute stroke care with respect to patient outcomes.30
The results suggest that even modest time reductions during the prehospital and in-hospital phases of acute stroke care elevate the treatment effectiveness of IVT and MT and subsequently carry substantial health gains for patients with AIS. Moreover, mean OTT reductions may also increase the proportion of patients eligible for acute stroke treatment with IVT only, MT only or IVT+MT.