Discussion
The role of the IRF2BPl gene, encoding for the interferon regulatory factor 2 binding like protein, in Mendelian disease was first established by Marcogliese et al.8 9 In 2000, IRF2BPL was mapped to the 14q24.3 chromosome.2 The ClinVar ID for IRF2BPL gene is 1 707 441 and genome reference consortium (GRC) build IDs are GRCh37 and GRCh38. Although the recently studied gene’s function is still not completely known, it was previously known as enhanced at puberty protein 1 (EAP1) and thought to contribute to the development of puberty.2 8 10 Recent studies now suggest IRF2BPL possibly plays a role in the development and homeostasis of the central nervous system also.2 Interestingly, in support of its function, the ubiquitin–proteasome system has been described in the nucleus, where IRBF2BPL proteins are also localised.11 In addition, various body cells show ubiquitous expression of the IRF2BPL, including the central nervous system.2 3
The IRF2BPL gene is highly intolerant to variation. Complete gene loss is lethal in early neuronal development, while partial knockdown is consistent with neurodegeneration and neurodevelopmental disabilities.2 7 8 The heterozygous variant IRF2BPL found in our patient does not prove to be lethal but delineates the phenotype of a broad spectrum of neurological disorders. This suggests that an intact gene is required for proper neuronal development, functioning and maintenance. In our case, a broader spectrum of neurological disorders such as regression, neurodevelopmental delay and seizures from a significant time period and no obvious underlying cause led us to order genetic testing.
Pisano et al, in their case study and systematic review of literature, concluded that all patients studied exhibited similar neurological symptoms of developmental delay/regression, mainly epilepsy, ataxia, spasticity, dystonia and ocular disturbances, with insignificant involvement of other organs in the body, suggesting the IRF2BPL mutation syndrome is highly specific to the central nervous system. The case study of a female in her 20s with the pathogenic variant of the IRF2BPL had developmental delay, myoclonic epilepsy, speech disturbances and dystonia. Similar to our patients, psychomotor development initially appeared normal, and symptoms of developmental delay or neurological regression did not show up until years after birth. Learning disabilities, including dyslexia and dyscalculia, started at 7.2
The study by Marcogliese et al further contributed to and strengthened the clinical diversity of IRF2BPL gene mutation and showed similarities with our patient’s symptoms. In the study of five patients with neurological regression, dominant de novo heterozygous variations in IRF2BPL were studied. The age of onset of motor regression in these patients ranged from 2.5 to 10 years of age, with the patients losing gross motor and oromotor skills. These previously normally developed patients became wheelchair-bound, had an unsteady gait, and exhibited progressive dysphagia and silent aspiration, eventually requiring tube feedings.8 Our study strengthens the studies on the phenotypic expansion of mutations occurring in the IRF2BPL gene. Neurological disorders of these patients included seizures in all patients, with some having ataxia, dystonia, hypotonia and/or choreoathetosis, similar to our patient, who presented with generalised tonic-clonic seizures and also exhibited mild hypotonia.8
In a study by Tran Mau-Them et al, all patients had de novo heterozygous truncating variants in the IRF2BPL gene, including nonsense and frameshift mutations.10 They all shared a similar phenotypic spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorder. Similar to our patient, the initial psychomotor development was normal, with neurological regression in most patients. Seizures presented early in life were apparent from ages 6 months to 26 years and included infantile spasms and tonic-clonic seizures with non-specific patterns on EEG and myoclonus. EEG showed multifocal polyspikes and waves, consistent with our patient’s EEG.10
In a Chinese case report by Yang et al, a young boy with a nonsense variant in IRF2BPL presented with rapid progressive dysarthria and dystonia. Although the patient did not experience epilepsy, as did our patient, the phenotypic spectrum of the disorder exhibited similarities. He had developed normally until the age of 8 years when he experienced motor regression with abnormal posture, dysphagia, dystonia and drooling, similar to our patient but without seizures.7
Studies on the gene IRF2BPL have been described as a novel cause of neurodevelopmental disorders characterised by neurological regression, epilepsy, dysphagia, dystonia, cerebellar symptoms and pyramidal signs. An additional study now also suggests that progressive myoclonus epilepsy can be an additional phenotype adding to the spectrum of disorders caused by mutations in the IRF2BPL gene.12 This suggests there is still much unknown about the gene, and future studies are encouraged to provide further insight into this topic of study.
In summary, a mutation in the IRF2BPL gene is consistent with variable central nervous system anomalies. Exome and genome sequencing have allowed for the identification of gene variants, including de novo heterozygous mutations consisting of nonsense, missense and frameshift mutations.10 In addition to other variants studied, our case supports the novel heterozygous variant in the gene, characterised by NM_0 24 496 c.911 C>T mutation, which results in premature protein termination (p.Glu494). Further, it delineates the phenotypic spectrum of the disorder characterised by neurological symptoms and regression. Our case strengthens knowledge and research on this recently studied gene and provides indications to improve recognition of its phenotypic expression and facilitate clinical diagnosis.