Introduction
Infarction of the fornix is a relatively rare, but well documented, stroke syndrome involving the subcallosal artery or lateral posterior choroidal arteries.1–4 The fornix plays a central role in human memory, as the major white matter outflow tract from the hippocampus. Previous case reports describe acute amnesia as the main presenting symptom of fornix infarction and there is clinical and experimental data to suggest a functional distribution of the forniceal fibres.5 Both anterograde and retrograde amnesia are possible, with case studies suggesting an increased incidence of anterograde memory impairment associated with lesions of the fornix.6–10
Clinical recovery following fornix infarction is less well understood.11 Memory symptoms may be, in part, reversible and the expected recovery time frame varies from weeks to months.1 Persistent and significant memory dysfunction has also been reported in some cases.6 12 This variability in clinical outcome might be explained by the incomplete involvement of the forniceal structures and associated ischaemia of nearby structures that subserve memory. Others have criticised the lack of comprehensive psychometric data necessary to document the true nature and extent of any residual memory dysfunction following isolated infarction of the fornix.6 9 12
To our knowledge, there are only five other case reports with detailed neuropsychological follow-up following relatively focal infarction of the fornix6 7 9 13 14 and only one was followed up beyond 6 months post stroke.6 Comprehensive, long-term neuropsychological studies are lacking and would greatly improve our understanding of the expected recovery time frames and cognitive outcomes after fornix infarction. This is particularly relevant for clinicians attempting to provide prognostic information to young stroke patients, where the integrity of memory function is central to their ability to return to independent living. We describe the findings from serial neuropsychological review undertaken in a young patient with an isolated ischaemic infarction of the fornix.
Case history
A patient in their 30s presented with 48 hours of ‘confusion and disorientation’. This was characterised by a sudden inability to recall details of recent events and conversations while travelling with family on holiday. The partner noted that the patient was forgetful of their daily travel itinerary and could not recall recent food and drink purchases or their location. They were able to reliably recall biographical information preceding the onset of confusion and remained oriented to the year and month but could not recall the date or day of the week. There was no disturbance of conscious state or fluctuation in attention, nor was there any language disturbance, psychotic phenomena, or personality change.
The patient did not experience headache, fever or any witnessed seizure activity and there was no history of head trauma. Alcohol intake was relatively increased while on holiday with four standard drinks being consumed in the 24 hours preceding presentation. However, there was no prior history of consistent heavy alcohol consumption. Previous medical history was only significant for well-controlled ulcerative colitis. The patient was a non-smoker and had no known cardiovascular risk factors. The Moderna COVID vaccine had been administered 4 weeks prior, but the patient had remained systemically well and had no symptoms or signs of other illness.
Neurological examination at the local hospital emergency department was unrevealing except for persisting anterograde amnesia and abnormal cerebral MRI. MRI (day 3; figure 1) documented bilateral symmetrical foci of diffusion restriction and fluid attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensity lateral to the foramen of Monro. The patient was then transferred to an acute stroke unit at a major public hospital and diagnosed with bilateral fornix infarction (day 5). Despite this finding, the formal National Institutes of Health Stroke Score on transfer was 0. Aspirin (100 mg) per day and atorvastatin (80 mg) per day were commenced as secondary stroke prevention. A full young stroke screen was performed with no underlying thrombophilia or diabetes being identified. New dyslipidaemia was diagnosed and a patent foramen ovale was found as a suspected stroke mechanism.
Neuropsychological examination at baseline (day 10)
The patient was alert and oriented to the year and month, but not the date or day of the week. There was no spontaneous report of memory difficulties, giving an impression of limited insight. On specific questioning, the patient could not reliably recall details of recent events. No repetitiveness was noted in conversation, nor was there evidence of confabulation. Formal examination (table 1) revealed mild reductions in attentional processing and a severe anterograde memory deficit for both verbal and visuospatial materials.
There were notable deficits in delayed recall, characterised by an inability to learn and retain novel word lists, visual images and arbitrarily associated information. Recall was not reliably assisted by recognition cues, with a high rate of false-positive responding. Spatio-constructional function was intact. Conversational speech and language were also unremarkable, although performances on measures of confrontation naming and strategic lexical retrieval were mildly reduced relative to normative expectations. Fronto-executive functions were well preserved.
Neuropsychological examination at early and late phases of recovery
Four weeks
At 1-month post stroke, the patient was better oriented to time, more certain of the year and only 1 day out on the correct day/date but remained unaware of ongoing memory limitations, except when confronted by memory failures. Collateral history highlighted persisting daily forgetfulness, including inability to recall details of recent conversations and forthcoming events, and the location of personal belongings. The patient was also heavily reliant on a mobile phone to keep track of the day and date.
Objective examination (table 1) revealed evidence of improvement in learning efficiency, consistent with the observed improvement on measures of attentional function. A relatively isolated and moderately severe anterograde memory deficit persisted for both verbal and visuospatial material. Mild improvement was seen in arbitrary associative learning, but this remained moderately impaired. Recognition recall remained unreliable. Previous reductions in confrontation naming and strategic lexical retrieval had resolved, and broader cognitive functions remained well preserved.
Four months
Four months into the recovery, the patient remained only partially oriented to time (incorrectly reported the day and date), but attentional function and processing speed had recovered, as expected (table 1). This was accompanied by significant improvement in learning efficiency, but there was persisting moderate-to-severe impairment in delayed recall on verbal and non-verbal memory measures, which was not reliably assisted by prompts or recognition cues. Intellectual performances fell in the ‘average’ to ‘high average’ range. Broader cognitive function was intact.
Nine months
At 9 months post stroke, family reported ongoing daily forgetfulness, with heavy reliance on compensatory strategies to support memory (eg, written reminders, diary use, phone alarms). The patient was cleared to return to driving but was not able to return to their previous work role, due to residual memory difficulties. On objective examination, orientation was now intact to person, place and time. Arbitrary associative learning and delayed recall showed mild improvement compared with the previous examination 5 months earlier, but delayed recall was not reliably assisted by recognition cues (table 1). These encouraging signs of memory recovery suggested reduction in the severity of memory dysfunction over the year, but the persisting mild-to-moderate anterograde memory disorder required ongoing use of compensatory memory strategies in daily life.