Discussion
In this post hoc analysis, we found self-reported ED to be high before the stroke or TIA, with four in 10 males affected. Increase in age was the only risk factor significantly associated with ED in our population. Only a non-significant trend for association of prevalent ED with CV risk factors (CVD, sleep apnoea, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia and physical inactivity) was found, likely reflecting a generally high load of CVD in our population.
The strength of our study is the inclusion of a large and diverse stroke patient population early after stroke, reducing the risk of recall bias in prestroke ED. Some limitations may, however, apply. Due to this study being a post hoc analysis, the assessment of prevalent ED was done by response to a single question. The use of a verified self-administered questionnaire, for example, the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5),13 would have improved the assessment of ED status and should be used for future studies. One in eight men reported not to know if they had problems with obtaining an erection. Such a lack of report may result in an underestimation of ED prevalence as the non-responders were discarded from the primary analysis. The cognitive status of the patients following a stroke where only assessed in the regular neurological examination on admission in this study, and only if the patient was estimated to provide informed consent they were included. However, minor cognitive deficits may have been present which could have influenced the patient’s response to the questionnaire. This study was a post hoc analysis in an observational study. The sample size was not high enough to detect and minor association between stroke, CV risk factors, and ED with a power of 0.8.
In our population, 4 in 10 men reported ED, which corresponds to previous studies on ED in patients who had a stroke.6 14 The prevalence of ED is known to increase markedly with age.15 In a study of 2126 US male participants, the prevalence of ED ranged from 5.1% in men aged 20–39 years to 70.2% in men aged 70 years and older.15 The prevalence of CV risk factors in men with ED was similar to the findings in our study in regard to hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and current smoking, but lower for diabetes, with 17.2% in the present and 30.9% in the US study. Previous CVD was higher in the present study (38.9% vs 12.9%).15 The high age of our study population with a median of 75 years for men with ED and 68 years for men without ED introduces a general high frequency of CV in both groups decreasing power to identify specific associations in either group. However, when investigating ED in a younger stroke population (mean age 56.1±9.8 years) including 605 male patients who had a stroke, CV risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, current smoking and obesity) were significantly more prevalent in men with ED compared with men without ED.6 Increasing prevalence of risk factors with advancing age, rather than the ageing process itself, have been hypothesised to account for the strong association between age and ED.5 16 It remains to be resolved if age itself, or the accumulation of risk factors with age, contributes to the strong association between ED and advanced age. The most common aetiology for ED is vasculogenic related to impaired endothelial function but may also include neurogenic, psychogenic, hormonal, cavernosal or drug-related issues.15 17 The endothelial dysfunction is considered to be the underlying pathology linking CVD and ED together (figure 1).18 In our study, the non-significant association between ED and modifiable CV risk factors does not necessarily imply that ED is not vasculogenic as the CV risk factors are present. Other causes of ED factors may, however, also apply.
We could not detect an association between ED and higher stroke severity, and this result reflects those previously reported.14 In men with ED, there was a more frequent use of antithrombotic and lipid-lowing medication, which could account for a lower risk of severe stroke, as secondary preventions were initiated prior to the stroke. A possible selection bias in our data may be that patients with moderate and severe stroke were less likely to be included in a questionnaire study based on the nature of their symptoms (aphasia or altered consciousness).
Addressing ED in male patients who had a stroke should be considered on discharge, due to a potential impact on the quality of life, in particular considering the high prevalence of ED in an elderly stroke population.19 Suffering a stroke may worsen pre-existing ED, also, ED may be caused by the stroke,14 or the poststroke medication, such as beta-blockers or antidepressant.17 In a cross-sectional survey, only one in two men with ED addressed their problems to a health professional.3 In our study, only 40% of the patients with ED were treated medically for ED with PDE5 inhibitors. The low number treated could reflect that men refrain from discussing ED, perhaps reflecting a stigma experienced with ED.4 5 Health professionals often fail to discuss sexuality with patients who had a stroke.20 The importance of clinicians to include questions on sexual function in patients who had a stroke, to optimise treatment by avoiding beta-blockers and antidepressants if ED is reported, needs to be emphasised. Also, the use of PDE5 inhibitors in ED treatment poststroke is challenged by recommended restrictions in the use of PDE5 inhibitors within the first 6 months from stroke, based on case reports of PDE5 inhibitors causing intracerebral haemorrhage.21 Conversely, PDE5 inhibitors have been hypothesised to be protective of CV outcomes,22 and the safety of these drugs should be further investigated in patients who had a stroke.
Addressing ED in patients who had a stroke is of great importance since it could help to improve the quality of life for the patients, help doctors to avoid ED provoking drugs and advise on relevant ED treatments. Future studies of ED among patients who had a stroke should be done using a verified self-administered questionnaire, for example, the 5-item version of the IIEF-5. It is also of interest to include a younger study population since the current results are not generalisable to this population.
In conclusion, 4 in 10 men reported the presence of ED prior to their stroke or TIA. We only found an association with age, but not with modifiable CV risk factors as this was present in both patient groups. In our population, prevalent ED did not serve as a marker for more severe stroke. However, it remains to be detected if patients with ED poststoke need a more intense risk factor modification than patients without ED.