Table 1

Clinical characteristics of sham and RIPC groups

Sham intervention (n=37)RIPC intervention (n=38)
Age (years), mean±SD44.0±12.547.6±11.3
Sex
 Female, n (%)27 (73)17 (44.7)
 Male, n (%)10 (27)21 (55.3)
Type of MS
 Relapsing remitting, n (%)34 (91.9)27 (71.1)
 Secondary progressive, n (%)1 (2.7)7 (18.4)
 Primary progressive, n ()2 (5.4)4 (10.5)
Time since diagnosis (months)137.1±129.6120.3±128.1
EDSS score, median (IQR)3.5 (2–6)5 (3.4–6.0)
EDSS score, n (%)
 001 (2.6)
 −1.03 (8.1)0
 −1.51 (2.7)2 (5.3)
 −2.010 (27%)2 (5.3%)
 −2.51 (2.7)0
 −3.004 (10.5)
 −3.54 (10.8)3 (7.9)
 −4.01 (2.7%)2 (5.3)
 −4.54 (10.8)3 (7.9)
 −5.02 (5.4)3 (7.9)
 −5.51 (2.7)2 (5.3)
 −6.08 (21.6)12 (31.6)
 −6.52 (5.4)3 (7.9)
 −7.001 (2.6)
  • EDSS, Extended Disability Status Scale; MS, multiple sclerosis; N, number of patients; RIPC, remote ischaemic preconditioning.