Discussion
Since 2009, we have had an ongoing effort to improve the diagnostics of adult mitochondrial diseases at the University of Turku and TUH. We found a considerable increase in the number of patients diagnosed with mitochondrial disease in Southwest Finland between 2009 and 2022, resulting in increased population prevalence estimates. We suggest that this increase is related to heightened awareness of mitochondrial disease and their clinical features and possibly also to improved availability of genetic investigations. The Finnish healthcare system is publicly funded. Diagnostics of mitochondrial disease takes place in tertiary-level specialist care (university hospitals). Most importantly, sufficient experience and knowledge to suspect mitochondrial disease are needed. Second, the increased availability and reduced costs both of complete mtDNA sequencing and whole exome sequencing have increased the yield of molecular diagnoses of mitochondrial disease.
The prevalence of mitochondrial disease has been evaluated in previous studies. In the population-based study from the province of North Ostrobothnia in Finland, m.3243A>G was found in 14 patients from 10 pedigrees.2 The frequency of m.3243A>G was calculated to be ≥16.3/100 000 in the adult population, while the prevalence of clinically affected individuals with m.3243A>G was estimated to be 5.7/100 000. In the same province, the prevalence of large-scale mtDNA deletions was 1.6/100 000 in the adult population.3 A comparison of these figures with the prevalence estimates in the present study suggests that these forms of mtDNA-related mitochondrial disease may be somewhat more common in North Ostrobothnia than in Southwest Finland.
In this study, ascertainment bias might take place if the likelihood of looking for mitochondrial disease would differ between various phenotypes, or the likelihood of detection would vary between different genetic causes. With the retrospective method used here, we can only speculate. It would however seem plausible that patients with common genetic causes such as large-scale mtDNA deletions or the m.3243A>G or patients with more severe phenotypes would receive a diagnosis. Large-scale mtDNA deletions can remain undetected in NGS analysis of mtDNA from white blood cells. In our data, muscle mtDNA was available from many patients, but a complete analysis of mtDNA from a non-mitotic tissue was not performed on all patients. Rare mtDNA variants and patients with uncommon or oligosymptomatic phenotypes are still likely to be under-represented in this study. However, as our results are fairly well in line with the data presented by others, we suggest that unique causes of ascertainment bias are not likely.
As another limitation, even more text search terms and ICD-10 items could have been added. The ICD-10 diagnoses H49.4 and H49.8 include also other diagnoses than those (progressive external ophthalmoplegia and Kearns-Sayre syndrome) related to mitochondrial disease. The use of abbreviations of mitochondrial syndromes such as MELAS, MERRF and NARP in the patient notes is variable, but we suggest that it is unlikely that the notion of a ‘mitochondrial disease’ would have been completely absent from the patient notes of the affected individuals. This is why we also searched the mtDNA genetic tests so that all individuals with genetically confirmed mtDNA disease would be included as completely as possible. The database query was performed at the end of 2021. However, we also included individuals we diagnosed in 2022. As one of the authors (MHM) was at the time responsible for the neurological diagnostic service for mitochondrial disease at TUH and thus well informed of patients newly diagnosed with mitochondrial disease, it is unlikely that the overall results are affected in the sense that other new diagnoses would have been missed.
Several studies have addressed the prevalence of adult mtDNA disease in North East England. The prevalence of clinically manifest mtDNA disease was estimated to be 9.2/100 000 and that of m.3243A>G to be 3.65/100 000.4 A continuation study by the same group suggested a minimum prevalence of 20/100 000 for mtDNA mutations. The overall minimum point prevalence of clinically affected adults was 9.6/100 000, and that of m.3243A>G was 3.5/100 000.5 These figures are like those in our study suggesting that the population prevalence of adult mtDNA-related mitochondrial disease is similar in these two North European populations. Recent studies9 10 suggest that the most common mtDNA haplogroups in the general healthy Finnish population are H (41%–46%) and U (25%–28%). Mitochondrial haplogroups were, however, not routinely investigated in the patients described in this study.
Despite increased immigration to Finland during the past three decades, the population in Finland remains comparatively homogenous, consisting mostly of Finns speaking either Finnish or Swedish as their first language. According to the official statistics (Statistics Finland 2022: Population 31.12.2022 by region, background country, sex, age, origin, year and information and by region, language, age, sex, year and information; https://pxdata.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vaerak/statfin_vaerak_pxt_11rt.px/), 91% of the population in Southwest Finland are of Finnish origin and 9% are classified as having some foreign background. Similarly, in Southwest Finland, the first language is Finnish for 85 %, Swedish for 5.7 % and some foreign language for ~9%. Among the many foreign languages, the most common is Russian (1.2 %), closely followed by Estonian and Arabic.
The epidemiology of LHON has previously been studied in several countries. The prevalence of LHON was reported to be 2.1/100 000 in Finland6 and 3.7/100 000 in North East England.11 In Denmark, LHON prevalence has been reported as 1.85/100 000.12 However, a study from the Finnish province of North Ostrobothnia has suggested a prevalence lower than 1.36/100 000 for the three common LHON variants (m.3460G>A, m.11778G>A and m.14484 T>C) being lower than that elsewhere in Western Europe or elsewhere in Finland.13 Similarly, the prevalence of the three common LHON variants has recently been reported to be only 0.3/100 000 in New Zealand, where the population is mostly of European origin.14 We found a LHON prevalence estimate at 2.2/100 000 in the adult population that was close to the previous estimate in the general Finnish population.
The prevalence figures in our study were based on clinically affected patients with genetically definite mitochondrial disease, that is, patients who have clinical features compatible with mitochondrial disease and who harbour a known pathogenic mtDNA variant that can explain the symptoms. The analysis of mtDNA in maternal relatives would result in a considerably higher number of individuals harbouring the mutation. Indeed, studies on population samples where most individuals are healthy and do not present any features suggestive of mitochondrial disease have revealed that the frequency of pathogenic mtDNA variants may be as high as 1/200–1/250.5 15 16 It is very difficult to speculate on the number of undiagnosed individuals. In 2010–2022, we observed a constant accumulation of patients with mtDNA disease. However, based on our experience in Southwest Finland, it is likely that adult mitochondrial disease is still under-recognized in Finland. Moreover, this most probably applies to other countries with highly developed healthcare systems as well. Dedicated effort and interest in the clinical diagnostics of mitochondrial disease make a considerable difference. From a global perspective, we still know little about mitochondrial disease in many developing countries and in under-represented populations. Further studies in these areas are needed.17
Our results suggest that the most common cause of mtDNA-related disease in the adult population is m.3243A>G followed by m.11778G>A and sporadic large-scale mtDNA deletions. The spectrum is identical to that in North East England (online supplemental table S2). However, a marked proportion of patients carry other pathogenic mtDNA variants that in our patients accounted for 24% (n=9), and the corresponding proportion was 27% in the UK data.5 If the clinical features suggest a mitochondrial disease, it is important to pursue the diagnosis further, even when the most common variants have been ruled out.
A definite diagnosis clarifies the underlying cause of symptoms to the patient and their close ones and often brings a long diagnostic journey to an end. In addition, diagnosis of a mitochondrial disease has specific implications for medical treatment and follow-up and also warrants genetic counselling. Our results, along with previous experience elsewhere in Finland and in North East England, suggest that a dedicated clinical and research effort across medical specialities in mitochondrial disease diagnostics is associated with a considerable increase in the number of patients receiving correct diagnosis.
This research was covered by the TUH research permission TO4/016/16.